Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

[cidbahamut]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

if they make the graphics good enough and pack it with lots of persistent world features and other bells and whistles and goodies not found in the existing pokemon games, even some veterans would be interested to start over, but more importantly they would reel in a new generation of fans and vets from other mmorpgs. :p

You seem to lack a fundamental understanding of everything.

[jenova_9]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

MEW!! mew mew mew mew MEW! I was just saying from my point of view, of course I don't have all the answers and full understanding, but it was just a innocent mewy thought! okay??? =^^=

[cidbahamut]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

There is nothing innocent about your damn mews. You're trying to convince yourself that a MMO can be built on the kinds of shiny knick knacks a magpie would collect. It doesn't work like that. Christ your stupidity infuriates me.

[jenova_9]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

There is nothing innocent about your damn mews. You're trying to convince yourself that a MMO can be built on the kinds of shiny knick knacks a magpie would collect. It doesn't work like that. Christ your stupidity infuriates me.

m-m-MEANY!!!!! =><= It was just an idea. Of course it takes more than graphics to convince consumers.


But ya, what if players could experience Pokemon like the pokemon anime? a fully realized 3-D world on console with thousands of players? the presentation alone would make jaws drop I think.

[Ufgt]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

Idk, but a pokemon MMO probably would have a monster following. I always imagined thats where the franchise would eventually go.

[jenova_9]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

it would gone in that direction if Nintendo wasn't so old fashioned and too stubborn to take online gaming seriously. Plus Nintendo has the most loyal fanatical fanbase on their side. Anything Nintendo makes, the fanbase praises as the best thing ever.

[Yellow Mage]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

Christ your stupidity infuriates me.

It infuriated me from ever since WotG release. Not any more.

It's called the Ignore List people, and believe you me, it is an oh so wonderful thing.

[TheGrandMom]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

It's called the Ignore List people, and believe you me, it is an oh so wonderful thing.

Thank you for the reminder YM.

Please use the Ignore Feature instead of letting people continually irritate you. It's there for a reason.

[Armando]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

A Pokemon MMO would suck completely because it would be even more grind-centric than the games, and the games already take unhealthy amounts of time commitment to be competitive.

And Pokemon fans don't care about bells and whistles, they want solid and balanced gameplay first and foremost.

[Cheezeman3000]

Re: Would you pay Nintendo for its online content?

I'll throw in my 3.5 cents and say a Pokemon MMO is the natural progression of the series. Sure, they don't HAVE to do one, but if they do, it'll feel natural. In the current games you're constantly battling other trainers. The difference with the MMO is that instead of these trainers being fake, they'll be real.

And is it just me or would the act of walking around in a 3D environment (most likely cell-shaded knowing Nintendo) seeing other trainers battling/trying to catch pokemon in real time be just about the most orgasmic thing I can possibly imagine? Think of it as Pokemon Snap off-rails.