Re: Magic: The Gathering
I don't think red aggression beats devotion to blue at the moment (not consistently, anyhow). It's not like decks with Master of Waves just sit around waiting for you to attack them; they're pretty aggressive in their own right, and are more than capable of keeping up with a red deck. They also pack enough light counterspells to shut down simple tricks like Seismic Stomp. In any case, in general the idea is that you do race them to 0 first, and for that I "get" why you want to stay aggressive even in the sideboard rather than slowing the deck down to play at someone else's pace (something which a mono red deck isn't typically well equipped to do in any case).
I still think Perilous Vault keeps defensive decks honest, though, particularly those that are combo-based. Not that there are many defensive decks in Standard at the moment, mind you, what with Supreme Verdict and Sphinx's Revelation rotating out (and taking esper control out with them).
Icemage
I don't think red aggression beats devotion to blue at the moment (not consistently, anyhow). It's not like decks with Master of Waves just sit around waiting for you to attack them; they're pretty aggressive in their own right, and are more than capable of keeping up with a red deck. They also pack enough light counterspells to shut down simple tricks like Seismic Stomp. In any case, in general the idea is that you do race them to 0 first, and for that I "get" why you want to stay aggressive even in the sideboard rather than slowing the deck down to play at someone else's pace (something which a mono red deck isn't typically well equipped to do in any case).
I still think Perilous Vault keeps defensive decks honest, though, particularly those that are combo-based. Not that there are many defensive decks in Standard at the moment, mind you, what with Supreme Verdict and Sphinx's Revelation rotating out (and taking esper control out with them).
Icemage
Comment