Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Magic: The Gathering

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Magic: The Gathering

    Originally posted by Malacite View Post
    Scared?
    Not at all. That card was never anything but stupid right from the start.


    Bastok & Windurst Rank 10. ZM, CoP, ToAU, WoTG, ACP, MKD, ASA & SOA Complete.
    99 Kannagi / 99 Armageddon / 119 Nirvana Adventuring Fellow: Level 99
    99 SMN / 99 NIN / 99 COR / 99 WHM / 99 PUP / 99 BLM / 99 THF / 99 SCH / 99 GEO

    Yyg's Blog: Tree of Awesome!

    Comment


    • Re: Magic: The Gathering

      I miss it (and browbeat)
      sigpic


      "BLAH BLAH BLAH TIDAL WAVE!!!"

      Comment


      • Re: Magic: The Gathering

        To be fair you get the same effect from an Izzet Staticaster for less mana: e.g wiping tokens.
        Rahal Gerrant - Balmung - 188 DRK
        Reiko Takahashi
        - Balmung - 182 AST, 191 BLM, 182 SCH, 188 SMN
        Haters Gonna Hate



        Comment


        • Re: Magic: The Gathering

          Holy tits. Holy tits. HOLY THUNDEROUS BOROS TITTIES!!!

          Click image for larger version

Name:	1nyz690klp_en.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	58.1 KB
ID:	1476585
          sigpic


          "BLAH BLAH BLAH TIDAL WAVE!!!"

          Comment


          • Re: Magic: The Gathering





            18 damage in one turn. Thankfully there are no standard legal cards like that.
            Rahal Gerrant - Balmung - 188 DRK
            Reiko Takahashi
            - Balmung - 182 AST, 191 BLM, 182 SCH, 188 SMN
            Haters Gonna Hate



            Comment


            • Re: Magic: The Gathering

              Oh by the way, Boros Charm. It has double strike. Swing.
              lagolakshmi on Guildwork :: Lago Aletheia on Lodestone

              Comment


              • Re: Magic: The Gathering

                I'm not seeing the combo with Spirit Flare, FW. Note that Spirit Flare says that you need to tap the creature in question.

                Boros Charm, as TM pointed out, is many times more threatening. At the very least, you're getting a chunk of damage through, even with First Strike blockers on the other end.

                Also, I remember playing with Pyroclasm when it was Standard legal, and I don't remember it being that big a deal. I think there were decks that had it in the sideboard? Then again, this was the same Standard that had Kor Firewalker, so make of that what you will.
                Originally posted by Armando
                No one at Square Enix has heard of Occam's Razor.
                Originally posted by Armando
                Nintendo always seems to have a legion of haters at the wings ready to jump in and prop up straw men about hardware and gimmicks and casuals.
                Originally posted by Taskmage
                GOD IS MIFFED AT AMERICA

                REPENT SINNERS OR AT LEAST GIVE A NONCOMMITTAL SHRUG

                GOD IS AMBIVALENT ABOUT FURRIES

                THE END IS COMING ONE OF THESE DAYS WHEN GOD GETS AROUND TO IT
                Originally posted by Taskmage
                However much I am actually smart, I got that way by confronting how stupid I am.
                Matthew 16:15

                Comment


                • Re: Magic: The Gathering

                  All I'm seeing is an inferior Ball Lightning.
                  Server: Midgardsormr -> Quetzalcoatl -> Valefor
                  Occupation: Reckless Red Mage
                  Name: Drjones
                  Blog: Mediocre Mage

                  Comment


                  • Re: Magic: The Gathering

                    Shows what you know.

                    This guy just adds to the list of already great 4-drop finishers. Works well late game with charm yeah, provided the other side doesn't have a giant fatty or first strikers.

                    Absolute limited bomb too, 12-point swing for 4? I'll take it.
                    sigpic


                    "BLAH BLAH BLAH TIDAL WAVE!!!"

                    Comment


                    • Re: Magic: The Gathering

                      Originally posted by Malacite View Post
                      Shows what you know.
                      More than you?

                      It'll do fine in limited and even in-block, but I wouldn't expect it to survive into the more expansive constructed environments. Ball Lightning hits the board for 3 mana and no color concerns. If you need the lifelink then you're trying to buy yourself time and have already lost.
                      Server: Midgardsormr -> Quetzalcoatl -> Valefor
                      Occupation: Reckless Red Mage
                      Name: Drjones
                      Blog: Mediocre Mage

                      Comment


                      • Re: Magic: The Gathering

                        Ball Lightning is better for mono-Red, i.e. cid's concerns.

                        Spark Trooper, being marginally less mana-intensive than Ball Lightning, is more playable in multicolor decks.

                        All-in-all, yes, it's a worse Ball Lightning, even accounting for the Lifelink compensation. Doesn't mean it's not going to cause some swingy board states to happen, however.
                        Last edited by Yellow Mage; 01-17-2013, 06:24 PM. Reason: It is, however, a much better Arc Runner. Also, Mal is totally stealing my Boros thunder, isn't he?
                        Originally posted by Armando
                        No one at Square Enix has heard of Occam's Razor.
                        Originally posted by Armando
                        Nintendo always seems to have a legion of haters at the wings ready to jump in and prop up straw men about hardware and gimmicks and casuals.
                        Originally posted by Taskmage
                        GOD IS MIFFED AT AMERICA

                        REPENT SINNERS OR AT LEAST GIVE A NONCOMMITTAL SHRUG

                        GOD IS AMBIVALENT ABOUT FURRIES

                        THE END IS COMING ONE OF THESE DAYS WHEN GOD GETS AROUND TO IT
                        Originally posted by Taskmage
                        However much I am actually smart, I got that way by confronting how stupid I am.
                        Matthew 16:15

                        Comment


                        • Re: Magic: The Gathering

                          Originally posted by Yellow Mage
                          Spark Trooper, being marginally less mana-intensive than Ball Lightning, is more playable in multicolor decks.
                          How is it less mana-instensive if it requires the same number of colored mana, uses two colors instead of one, and requires an extra mana on top of that?

                          Am I missing something here?

                          Comment


                          • Re: Magic: The Gathering

                            You don't have to pay 3 Red, is what I was getting at. If you had something like, say, Steam Vents, Hallowed Fountain, and Sacred Foundry in play, you've already taken care of the colored mana cost.
                            Originally posted by Armando
                            No one at Square Enix has heard of Occam's Razor.
                            Originally posted by Armando
                            Nintendo always seems to have a legion of haters at the wings ready to jump in and prop up straw men about hardware and gimmicks and casuals.
                            Originally posted by Taskmage
                            GOD IS MIFFED AT AMERICA

                            REPENT SINNERS OR AT LEAST GIVE A NONCOMMITTAL SHRUG

                            GOD IS AMBIVALENT ABOUT FURRIES

                            THE END IS COMING ONE OF THESE DAYS WHEN GOD GETS AROUND TO IT
                            Originally posted by Taskmage
                            However much I am actually smart, I got that way by confronting how stupid I am.
                            Matthew 16:15

                            Comment


                            • Re: Magic: The Gathering

                              Originally posted by Armando View Post
                              How is it less mana-instensive if it requires the same number of colored mana, uses two colors instead of one, and requires an extra mana on top of that?

                              Am I missing something here?
                              It doesn't have a triple mana-cost to it, which in a multi-color deck would be very prohibitive - especially if you want to run this in Naya. And no, Cid, you clearly don't know wtf you're talking about. This thing is a BOMB in limited and will absolutely see play in constructed - Even late game, this guy can be utterly crazy with Aurelia on the field. Speaking of which, she's still the only big Boros rare I've been horribly disappointed with - they should have at least given her 5 toughness, or possibly bumped her down to 5 mana but for an effect like hers, and with haste, that would be messed up. I just don't like that she's in Mortar range, even if she can end games the turn she lands.

                              EDIT: Not just Aurelia, but Boros Charm (late game) and Silverblade Paladin say hi 2 Sparky. At this point I'm honestly more interested to see what new tools the guilds will have to work with once ISD block rotates out, because then we're going to lose a lot of staples like Champion of the Parish.
                              sigpic


                              "BLAH BLAH BLAH TIDAL WAVE!!!"

                              Comment


                              • Re: Magic: The Gathering

                                Once it rotates out of Standard it won't see a whole lot of play in constructed. Ball Lightning is still the better card.
                                Server: Midgardsormr -> Quetzalcoatl -> Valefor
                                Occupation: Reckless Red Mage
                                Name: Drjones
                                Blog: Mediocre Mage

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X