Re: Magic: The Gathering
That deck sounds like balls. No offense.
Thing with Vraska is she's basically guaranteed to at least two-for-one if you play her right, and it's hard to find a card in this Standard that says "destroy that" with no loopholes or caveats. I mean, "non-land" notwithstanding. If there was a Golgari deck doing well on the pro scene, you can bet she'd be in the list somewhere, but they'd almost certainly wish they could play Maelstrom Pulse instead.
Originally posted by Malacite
View Post
Thing with Vraska is she's basically guaranteed to at least two-for-one if you play her right, and it's hard to find a card in this Standard that says "destroy that" with no loopholes or caveats. I mean, "non-land" notwithstanding. If there was a Golgari deck doing well on the pro scene, you can bet she'd be in the list somewhere, but they'd almost certainly wish they could play Maelstrom Pulse instead.
Comment