re: Gloom and doom
Of course Raydeus likes this post. NdGT is essentially giving LeLouch's last speech.
While I agree with the general social disease he refers to of people yearning for the past or clinging to the present instead of reaching for the future, and space exploration is obviously important for the long-term future of the race life, I think there's a lot of tomorrows left here on earth, and there are lots of other places we could spend money to advance into the future that might be more efficient and reap better short-term gains. I also disagree strongly that a good way to go about developing space travel is to steal money out of everyone's paychecks via taxes and dump all of those eggs into one bloated and inefficient government-controlled basket. That's wrongheaded on many levels.
---------- Post added at 12:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:40 PM ----------
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is a badass, btw, and I'm not disputing that. I agree with almost everything he says. But as an astrophysicist I think he has an overwhelming bias towards the sky, which is understandable but needs to be accounted for.
Originally posted by geogolem
View Post
While I agree with the general social disease he refers to of people yearning for the past or clinging to the present instead of reaching for the future, and space exploration is obviously important for the long-term future of the race life, I think there's a lot of tomorrows left here on earth, and there are lots of other places we could spend money to advance into the future that might be more efficient and reap better short-term gains. I also disagree strongly that a good way to go about developing space travel is to steal money out of everyone's paychecks via taxes and dump all of those eggs into one bloated and inefficient government-controlled basket. That's wrongheaded on many levels.
---------- Post added at 12:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:40 PM ----------
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is a badass, btw, and I'm not disputing that. I agree with almost everything he says. But as an astrophysicist I think he has an overwhelming bias towards the sky, which is understandable but needs to be accounted for.
Comment