Re: Our friends at Westboro Church have decided...
1- If you're caught speeding, you're driving, and you're already required to have your DL on you for obvious and constitutionally sound reasons. Not an argument. Also, if you're caught committing a crime, you're legally required to give reasonably identifying information (Name, DOB, and address IIRC) upon arrest and booking. ID may make life easier on the cops, but it's in no way legally required for just walking around.
2 & 3- If you go out into the world full of fear every day, I feel sorry for you. I'm not saying there aren't advantages to carrying it everywhere, but it's not legally required.
Oh, and if I'm taking my ID, I'm taking my wallet. I'd say there's a far higher chance that I would have my wallet lost or stolen while out and about than that I would be in a situation where my ID is required for vital medical care. I do usually take my cellphone however, and that's an even more useful means of contacting people since it has numbers of people close to me right there. If anyone looked at my ID, they'd have no clear means of contacting anyone else; the address on the ID is frequently uninhabited, which would require lengthier research time.
In general, might my lack of ID pose a small threat to myself? Sure. But it's not the government's place to say you have to have something on you for safety. I personally keep a small penknife on my keychain. I find it insanely handy. I'd hardly say that anyone leaving the house without their penknife deserves to be harassed by the police.
And keep making unconnected racially charged comments if you want to. Meanwhile, those of us with a brain are going to read the law instead of Drudge Report.
Here, this is the fact sheet that the Government of the State of Arizona put out: SB1070 - 492R - Senate Fact Sheet
What's the number one item on the list? That Police question anyone who they believe might possibly be an illegal immigrant. This is where the inevitable and unconstitutional harassment of American citizens comes on. Also note that, contrary to your claims, this is explicitly noted to be any legitimate contact, not those related to crimes. I know it's hard to imagine, but there are actually people here unlawfully who are good, upstanding people, not criminal scum. So you having to do something to get the police involved means pretty much leaving your house. Or not leaving your house, if your neighbors dislike you.
Also see number seven: Law Enforcement agencies are liable for harassment in the courts if they don't enforce this as fully as any citizen with enough money and free time to sue feels like it should be. This means that officers are either being forced to harass people on the basis of their race in order to avoid a lawsuit, or forced into lawsuits that will take away resources that could be used to actually fight crime.
Really, BBQ, I know it's hard to imagine, but not only are latinos not all criminals, we don't all care about sports either. I have no clue what sports teams, if any, Arizona has. I haven't given business to a sports team in at least a decade. And you know what? Hell, let's say I don't give a shit about any latinos. Fuck 'em all, right? I'm still not going to travel through Arizona, because it's a very real threat to my security. And I'd still avoid supporting them when I can, considering this isn't just an unforgivable attack on civil liberties and the constitution, but it's an attack on my civil liberties. I'm not giving money to government that would persecute me if given the chance.
Originally posted by Omgwtfbbqkitten
View Post
2 & 3- If you go out into the world full of fear every day, I feel sorry for you. I'm not saying there aren't advantages to carrying it everywhere, but it's not legally required.
Oh, and if I'm taking my ID, I'm taking my wallet. I'd say there's a far higher chance that I would have my wallet lost or stolen while out and about than that I would be in a situation where my ID is required for vital medical care. I do usually take my cellphone however, and that's an even more useful means of contacting people since it has numbers of people close to me right there. If anyone looked at my ID, they'd have no clear means of contacting anyone else; the address on the ID is frequently uninhabited, which would require lengthier research time.
In general, might my lack of ID pose a small threat to myself? Sure. But it's not the government's place to say you have to have something on you for safety. I personally keep a small penknife on my keychain. I find it insanely handy. I'd hardly say that anyone leaving the house without their penknife deserves to be harassed by the police.
Originally posted by Omgwtfbbqkitten
View Post
Here, this is the fact sheet that the Government of the State of Arizona put out: SB1070 - 492R - Senate Fact Sheet
What's the number one item on the list? That Police question anyone who they believe might possibly be an illegal immigrant. This is where the inevitable and unconstitutional harassment of American citizens comes on. Also note that, contrary to your claims, this is explicitly noted to be any legitimate contact, not those related to crimes. I know it's hard to imagine, but there are actually people here unlawfully who are good, upstanding people, not criminal scum. So you having to do something to get the police involved means pretty much leaving your house. Or not leaving your house, if your neighbors dislike you.
Also see number seven: Law Enforcement agencies are liable for harassment in the courts if they don't enforce this as fully as any citizen with enough money and free time to sue feels like it should be. This means that officers are either being forced to harass people on the basis of their race in order to avoid a lawsuit, or forced into lawsuits that will take away resources that could be used to actually fight crime.
Really, BBQ, I know it's hard to imagine, but not only are latinos not all criminals, we don't all care about sports either. I have no clue what sports teams, if any, Arizona has. I haven't given business to a sports team in at least a decade. And you know what? Hell, let's say I don't give a shit about any latinos. Fuck 'em all, right? I'm still not going to travel through Arizona, because it's a very real threat to my security. And I'd still avoid supporting them when I can, considering this isn't just an unforgivable attack on civil liberties and the constitution, but it's an attack on my civil liberties. I'm not giving money to government that would persecute me if given the chance.
Comment