Re: What are your views on teen pregnancy?
Exactly. I know people who are 16 that are more mature then some people in their 30s. That is, not to say they should have a baby at 16, but depending on the situation, I can see were it could be plausible. However, at that age, most people are overcome by emotions and they don't know what life really is, and they think they will be with their current boyfriend for the rest of their life. Very, very unlikely to happen.
Basically, if they plan on having a baby, raising it like a good parent, taking care of all it's needs and wants, maintaining a good income, and providing a good home, I commend them for it. It doesn't matter if they are 16 or 60. I will however, say such a situation is much less likely to occur at 16. In short, if it was planned, and if they can handle it, I can respect them for it. However, if it was an act of selfishness, then I see it as highly disrespectful to just about everyone else in the world.
And Feba - I think that couples should have the right to their own blood child. However, I do not think they should be allowed to pump out babies faster then a rabbit pumps out bunnies. 2 is good. 3 is pushing it. Unless you had triplets or something, I can't see the need for 4 or more, you are only destabilizing the family. I understand what you mean with adoption, but it can be a lot harder to raise a child that is not your flesh in blood. Eventually, you will develop a connection, but at the mother-and-child connection first it isn't there, making it much more difficult for the inexperienced in the early years, when it matters most.
Originally posted by Feba
View Post
Basically, if they plan on having a baby, raising it like a good parent, taking care of all it's needs and wants, maintaining a good income, and providing a good home, I commend them for it. It doesn't matter if they are 16 or 60. I will however, say such a situation is much less likely to occur at 16. In short, if it was planned, and if they can handle it, I can respect them for it. However, if it was an act of selfishness, then I see it as highly disrespectful to just about everyone else in the world.
And Feba - I think that couples should have the right to their own blood child. However, I do not think they should be allowed to pump out babies faster then a rabbit pumps out bunnies. 2 is good. 3 is pushing it. Unless you had triplets or something, I can't see the need for 4 or more, you are only destabilizing the family. I understand what you mean with adoption, but it can be a lot harder to raise a child that is not your flesh in blood. Eventually, you will develop a connection, but at the mother-and-child connection first it isn't there, making it much more difficult for the inexperienced in the early years, when it matters most.
Comment