If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Of course, but I don't see how this is unconstitutional.
Allowing peoples of one sexual orientation to marry while another is denied? Last I checked, that fell under discrimination, which, in some schools of thought, can be considered unconstitutional.
Allowing peoples of one sexual orientation to marry while another is denied? Last I checked, that fell under discrimination, which, in some schools of thought, can be considered unconstitutional.
Well, polygamy shouldn't be too far behind then. As well as getting married to animals. It's just a matter of where it will end I guess.
To be the best in this game...you must help each other become the best.
Well, polygamy shouldn't be too far behind then. As well as getting married to animals. It's just a matter of where it will end I guess.
Funny, Canada has had Gay marriage for some time, and it hasn't descended into lawless anarchy with people fucking animals in the street and marrying their entire graduating high school class.
Massachusetts though? Apparently you can't even go outside without being compelled to screw some random dude, so clearly it's a slippery slope.
You missed the sarcastic point. Ifmarriage didn't exist, then this whole ridiculous battle would me moot.
Marriage is slowly becoming obsolete anyway. Most people I know prefer not to get married as it is too much of a hassle. Both getting in and out. There are really no benefits from marriage that can't be gotten another way, either through wills or powers of attorney.
On top of that, you actually get penalized by the IRS for being married.
Comment