I have some questions for people that still support copyright law, because as I see it it's downright silly nowadays.
For these examples, I will use a CD or song or such, as it's the quickest thing to type, but the same would apply to any tape, record, cartridge, DVD, Blu-Ray, dead tree, or any other format that copyrighted media may be sold in. Keep in mind I'm looking for a *defense* of this, not just "because that's the law."
1- Why is it ok for someone to buy a CD, and later give it to a friend, but not ok for that person to make a copy for a friend?
2- Why is it ok for someone to lend a CD to a friend, but not make a copy for the friend to destroy later?
3- Why is it ok to buy a used CD, but not to download the contents of the CD? (As neither practice gives money to the artist)
4- Why is it ok for me to watch a DVD with three friends in my house, but illegal for me to make three copies and have them watch it elsewhere?
5- Why is it not ok for me to download software that isn't made anymore?
6- Why is it ok for an artist who makes millions of dollars to profit off someone's music without paying them (by sampling), but not ok for a fan to listen to music without paying that same artist?
7- Why is it ok for companies like the MAFIAA to sue people for sharing content with the implication that it is harmful to the artists, when the winnings don't actually go to said artists?
8- How does making money years after your death encourage people to create art? Assume the artist has no family, or does not wish for them to profit off the works.
9- Why is it legal for me to get a song stuck in my head, but illegal for me to stick a song in my iPod?
10- How would a lack of copyright damage society? Keep in mind that many bands (as well as other entities in other types of media) have already profited off of freely redistributable content.
For these examples, I will use a CD or song or such, as it's the quickest thing to type, but the same would apply to any tape, record, cartridge, DVD, Blu-Ray, dead tree, or any other format that copyrighted media may be sold in. Keep in mind I'm looking for a *defense* of this, not just "because that's the law."
1- Why is it ok for someone to buy a CD, and later give it to a friend, but not ok for that person to make a copy for a friend?
2- Why is it ok for someone to lend a CD to a friend, but not make a copy for the friend to destroy later?
3- Why is it ok to buy a used CD, but not to download the contents of the CD? (As neither practice gives money to the artist)
4- Why is it ok for me to watch a DVD with three friends in my house, but illegal for me to make three copies and have them watch it elsewhere?
5- Why is it not ok for me to download software that isn't made anymore?
6- Why is it ok for an artist who makes millions of dollars to profit off someone's music without paying them (by sampling), but not ok for a fan to listen to music without paying that same artist?
7- Why is it ok for companies like the MAFIAA to sue people for sharing content with the implication that it is harmful to the artists, when the winnings don't actually go to said artists?
8- How does making money years after your death encourage people to create art? Assume the artist has no family, or does not wish for them to profit off the works.
9- Why is it legal for me to get a song stuck in my head, but illegal for me to stick a song in my iPod?
10- How would a lack of copyright damage society? Keep in mind that many bands (as well as other entities in other types of media) have already profited off of freely redistributable content.
Comment