If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Ouch. I guess that means pictures where the woman is wearing skintight clothes and the artist decided to define the nipples are out. That's a shame, I just found a really kick-ass Altima picture. Oh well. Moving on, I think I'll give the loli a rest for now. Y'know...consideration for those other peoples who aren't quite so loli-crazy and stuff. So let's kick it oldschool (is that a real phrase?) with some 16-bit goodness!
I think those rules were meant to apply to pics that were actually nude. To an extent I suppose that's still open to interpretation since the exact same inking colored two different ways could be nude or fully clothed depending on the artist's style. Just use your best judgement. No exposed, detailed sexual organs.
I never really understood why it's ok for men to be topless nowadays, but not women. There's a big difference between something you defecate or urinate out of, and a part of the body that produces milk. I could understand if it's because of a perceived sexuality to them- but then you should nix sandals and bare feet, feet fetishism is one of, if not the, most common fetish out there. Honestly, nothing except those robes that most people call 'female oppression' would overcome that hipocracy.
Actually, I think in some US states it's not legally indecent exposure for women to be topless anymore. Cultural stigma still prevents it from being common though.
Ehh, why do that when there's already Gulkeeva's? >.>
Anyway, that's probably not the kind of element we'd want to add to the site. Seeing naked girls isn't usually a segue into mature, rational discussion. At least, I know I turn into an idiot. >.>
Comment