Re: Version Update Sneak Peek (07/17/2009)
I know what you mean, but you can't weigh skill in fighting games or first person shooters on the same terms as skill in RTS or MMORPGs.
By your logic here, no game requires skill simply because you'd have to refer to something. You didn't learn your Smash Bros. Melee moves without a reference or practice. You had to look at the movelists, practice, observe animations and so on. Smash Bros doesn't deal in dice rolls, elemental weaknesses or understanding group morale.
Hell, you can't even talk about one fighting game to another in terms of skill and it mean the same thing? What is a skilled DoA player do that will help him beat a Virtual Fighter 5 player? The games aren't on the same level at all.
I'm sure you'd agree with me that Pokemon actually is one of the deepest RPGs out there, but people will readily overlook that depth and go play a lesser game with flashy "mature" cinematies (Aerith died, boo hoo) and consider themselves a skilled RPG player. Skill in RPGs is resource management, building effective characters, knowing strengths and weakneses, knowing how to build your character's skills and acting accordingly with them in combat. And that's before we get to the dice rolls, dungeons and exploration.
That's not far removed from what you have to do with a Zelda game, but does that fact it requires some reflexes suddenly make it a game of greater skill and sophistication. I love my Zelda games, but I wouldn't exactly say so.
Originally posted by Armando
By your logic here, no game requires skill simply because you'd have to refer to something. You didn't learn your Smash Bros. Melee moves without a reference or practice. You had to look at the movelists, practice, observe animations and so on. Smash Bros doesn't deal in dice rolls, elemental weaknesses or understanding group morale.
Hell, you can't even talk about one fighting game to another in terms of skill and it mean the same thing? What is a skilled DoA player do that will help him beat a Virtual Fighter 5 player? The games aren't on the same level at all.
I'm sure you'd agree with me that Pokemon actually is one of the deepest RPGs out there, but people will readily overlook that depth and go play a lesser game with flashy "mature" cinematies (Aerith died, boo hoo) and consider themselves a skilled RPG player. Skill in RPGs is resource management, building effective characters, knowing strengths and weakneses, knowing how to build your character's skills and acting accordingly with them in combat. And that's before we get to the dice rolls, dungeons and exploration.
That's not far removed from what you have to do with a Zelda game, but does that fact it requires some reflexes suddenly make it a game of greater skill and sophistication. I love my Zelda games, but I wouldn't exactly say so.
Comment