≪Sep. 9, 2008 (JST) Update Details≫

[Lmnop]

Re: ≪Sep. 9, 2008 (JST) Update Details≫

What makes the most curious is:

How many people who are complaining about the state of the Absolute Virtue issue really had plans to fight him at some point or another?

<<

It has nothing to do with anticipating them failing or not. Logically it never made sense. You can't take an NM and condense its fight down to a 10th of what it was before without losing most if not all of it's originality. A few of us brought up the fact that it just didn't feel as unique any more and we got blown off for it. I wasn't gloating or cheering 'I was right so suck it!', I was simply saying that it turned out about as bad as some of us thought it would.

Don't give me the 'I gave SE the benefit of the doubt' tripe either like I'm on some sort of witch hunt. I defend SE and their policies rather vigorously. This change just seemed like a panic move on their part that wasn't well thought out. I have a feeling that today's maintenance won't improve things much either.

I didn't agree, but I was wrong. Simple as that. Carry on?

[Susurrus]

Re: ≪Sep. 9, 2008 (JST) Update Details≫

The requirements for acquiring and maintaining medals have been eased.

I haven't been able to log on since before the update, but I'm curious.

More info, please! >.>

How much did they change it?

[Omgwtfbbqkitten]

Re: ≪Sep. 9, 2008 (JST) Update Details≫

I haven't been able to log on since before the update, but I'm curious.

More info, please! >.>

How much did they change it?

It went from pain-in-the-ass to slightly less of a pain-in-the-ass.