The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

[Radel-King_of_Pirates]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

they look like it but eh . . .god I hate those ugly hats ;_; how can they put great stats on such and ugly thing

[Anson]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

It's nice to see that they're still releasing this extra reading material at PlayOnline.com. I was kinda disappointed when they cancelled the Vana'diel Tribune, but I guess they still are putting some of their old writers to work after all.

[dirtyclown]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

I'm all ready for some witch hunting. Got a torch, a jug of Oil and a pitchfork. Who's got enough ranks in Woodworking to make some sturdy lynching poles?

[Omniblast]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

We all know that this is going to give the white mage a new job ability called "Turn Undead". Com'n guys/gals you need to read deeper into this.
/sub Murphie

[Raydeus]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

I just wanna say that fugly+1 RDM JSE from the last pic is scarier than all the witches of Vana put together.



PS > If that's the quest for this Harvest Festival I might take the time to give it a try, I've skipped the event the last 2 years.

[Jei]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

we have great stats for subligars too.

[Raydeus]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

we have great stats for subligars too.

Yay for nightmares tonight!



Come to think of it, why don't they just bring the Tribune back? It was a much better way for finding out about all these stuff, and it was really a big part of the XI experience (at least for me).

[Ziero]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

Ya know, now that I can see the pics on the site I noticed something. In the first pic, with the line of witches, there's only five of the six shown. Only the arm of the last one can be seen...and it looks like a Galka arm.

[dirtyclown]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

I noticed that as well. Conspiracy?

[Akashimo]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

Conspiracy, maybe, cross dressing galka <|fact|>

[Ziero]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

Well did they every specifically state they were all female?

And there's always the fact that galka have no 'real' gender.

Though it could be another case of this




Edit: Also, it looks like some of them are wearing the same blm hat seen in the 'new recepie and armor' announcment. Just an observation is all.

[Akashimo]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

ahhh my eyes they're blinded x.x
and good point... yet the character selection + geyh trunks says they're guys :x

[UnnamedGalka]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

And there's always the fact that galka have no 'real' gender.

Actually, yes, they do. Galka are male.

One of the main storyboard directors for the game already established the fact that Galka are male in an interview. I'll quote his exact words if you so desire.

[Satori]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

Christ were going to be flayed alive, they'l eat the children!
maybe spells that take multiple mages to cast!
*hides under bed*

I dont want to be manaburnt!

[tomfin10]

Re: The Dark Lilies (Volume 1.) (10/13/2006)

Oh noez! Estya must be one of the Dark Lilies!