Before you start flaming me for my "stupid" topic please read what i have to say and post your comments.
People say that warriors are 7/7 in terms of attack and defense, while paladin's are 5/10 and dark knight's are 10/5. I have to disagree with that comment. I believe warriors are at least 9/9 if not 10/10 (with a thief). Well.. why do i say that?
Ok, well since i'm a lvl 61 drk and a lvl 40 warrior I would like to start with my own perspective of why war is better than drk first.
Lets take lvl 75 for an example since the stats are the biggest in difference at that lvl these are the stats for an elvaan drk/thf (most common choice) and elvaan war/sam (most common choice for war's that like to deal damage)
Stats - HP MP STR DEX VIT AGI INT MND CHR
War/sam - 1529 0 88 67 70 59 47 64 60
Drk/thf - 1416 236 86 69 73 58 62 57 48
How war is better?
1) War has higher strength
2) Accuracy to a war does not matter as to a dark knight. If a warrior uses Gaxe (which hits equally as hard as a scythe) and uses shield break at the beginning of each battle, then a war hits just as often as a dark with good +acc stuff.
3) Since war's dont have to worry about +acc stuff, they can use +atk +str items. Although my warrior is only at lvl 40, i barely ever miss after the second battle (when i get to use my first shield break). Thus, I wear all +str stuff and +atk stuff. (The lvl 36 +3 strength rings cost less than sniper ring). Ok, so with all this strength
4) So how much harder do I hit? I hit for about 20~30 more damage per hit. How often? Just as often. In fact i end each battle with at least 100 TP for the next monster to shield break again.
So what's my conclusion? Warrior's deal more damage than dark knights. So what? well.. what's the point of inviting a dark knight if it deals less damage than a war?
Ok, and now lets move on to dragoon. There's not much to proove here because they're the same as dark knights except they have lower strength and they wear the same amounts of +acc stuff... so nuff said about dragoons.
Ok, now to the spot where i cannot completely confirm, since i dont have a paladin myself. I party with paladin's regularly because i'm a berserk hore and love to use meat mithkabobs. My defense/vit goes to hell when i do so. But sometimes when i dont have a paladin i use my axe/shield and tank just as well. Voke the first 3 times for 90 seconds then save the rest of the voke for the occasional hate lost (based on imac2much's theory about provoke..). I never lose hate as a warrior even with a ranger and 2 blm's in my party. (without a thief). So with a thief i would be able to keep hate even better.
Now anyways, most likely if i'm going to tank as a war, i'll be using war/nin instead of war/sam. I don't think i need to say must that at lvl 75 war/nin is a better tank than pld/war. But before that, a War/nin with Utsusemi: Ichi and a ninja can tank just as good as a paladin. Yes, paladin's take less damage per hit, but with the Utsusemi: Ichi it averages out on slower non-double attacking monsters. And even if the damage that the war takes in doesnt average out, the damage the war willl deal is significant'y more than a paladin's, which is enough to end the battle fast enough before taking that much damage. With the help of fishkabobs, war's can become even better tanks. And if needed to, war's can use defender at lvl 25 (pld's can't use it until lvl 50). And AF armor..... the body piece alone gives more emnity than the paladin's entire set. I don't think i need to say anymore than that.
So,
assuming you didnt fall asleep reading this, i would greatlly appreciate any non-flaming inputs about my input about warrior. I honestly think its an awesome job. Its as good or if not better than a dark, and its as good and if not better than a paladin. It is not worse than both. It is not a 7/7.
I give war a two thumbs up
People say that warriors are 7/7 in terms of attack and defense, while paladin's are 5/10 and dark knight's are 10/5. I have to disagree with that comment. I believe warriors are at least 9/9 if not 10/10 (with a thief). Well.. why do i say that?
Ok, well since i'm a lvl 61 drk and a lvl 40 warrior I would like to start with my own perspective of why war is better than drk first.
Lets take lvl 75 for an example since the stats are the biggest in difference at that lvl these are the stats for an elvaan drk/thf (most common choice) and elvaan war/sam (most common choice for war's that like to deal damage)
Stats - HP MP STR DEX VIT AGI INT MND CHR
War/sam - 1529 0 88 67 70 59 47 64 60
Drk/thf - 1416 236 86 69 73 58 62 57 48
How war is better?
1) War has higher strength
2) Accuracy to a war does not matter as to a dark knight. If a warrior uses Gaxe (which hits equally as hard as a scythe) and uses shield break at the beginning of each battle, then a war hits just as often as a dark with good +acc stuff.
3) Since war's dont have to worry about +acc stuff, they can use +atk +str items. Although my warrior is only at lvl 40, i barely ever miss after the second battle (when i get to use my first shield break). Thus, I wear all +str stuff and +atk stuff. (The lvl 36 +3 strength rings cost less than sniper ring). Ok, so with all this strength
4) So how much harder do I hit? I hit for about 20~30 more damage per hit. How often? Just as often. In fact i end each battle with at least 100 TP for the next monster to shield break again.
So what's my conclusion? Warrior's deal more damage than dark knights. So what? well.. what's the point of inviting a dark knight if it deals less damage than a war?
Ok, and now lets move on to dragoon. There's not much to proove here because they're the same as dark knights except they have lower strength and they wear the same amounts of +acc stuff... so nuff said about dragoons.
Ok, now to the spot where i cannot completely confirm, since i dont have a paladin myself. I party with paladin's regularly because i'm a berserk hore and love to use meat mithkabobs. My defense/vit goes to hell when i do so. But sometimes when i dont have a paladin i use my axe/shield and tank just as well. Voke the first 3 times for 90 seconds then save the rest of the voke for the occasional hate lost (based on imac2much's theory about provoke..). I never lose hate as a warrior even with a ranger and 2 blm's in my party. (without a thief). So with a thief i would be able to keep hate even better.
Now anyways, most likely if i'm going to tank as a war, i'll be using war/nin instead of war/sam. I don't think i need to say must that at lvl 75 war/nin is a better tank than pld/war. But before that, a War/nin with Utsusemi: Ichi and a ninja can tank just as good as a paladin. Yes, paladin's take less damage per hit, but with the Utsusemi: Ichi it averages out on slower non-double attacking monsters. And even if the damage that the war takes in doesnt average out, the damage the war willl deal is significant'y more than a paladin's, which is enough to end the battle fast enough before taking that much damage. With the help of fishkabobs, war's can become even better tanks. And if needed to, war's can use defender at lvl 25 (pld's can't use it until lvl 50). And AF armor..... the body piece alone gives more emnity than the paladin's entire set. I don't think i need to say anymore than that.
So,
assuming you didnt fall asleep reading this, i would greatlly appreciate any non-flaming inputs about my input about warrior. I honestly think its an awesome job. Its as good or if not better than a dark, and its as good and if not better than a paladin. It is not worse than both. It is not a 7/7.
I give war a two thumbs up
Comment