Originally posted by Ixaera
You really shouldn't be getting higher attack from kabobs unless your attack is very low o.O I get 382 with mithkabob, 388 with curry. But that's not too bad, it's the 20 less while berserked that bugs me.
And yeah, curry is 6k on bismarck, while chiefkabobs are 18-20k for 12. But I don't mind the expense, honestly. It's not that much, and since I can *see* the difference, I don't feel like I'm wasting gil.
Also, you may have been misreading. What I said was:
"not a whole lot different from mithkabob"
Curry is most certainly better than chiefkabob at 68.
You really shouldn't be getting higher attack from kabobs unless your attack is very low o.O I get 382 with mithkabob, 388 with curry. But that's not too bad, it's the 20 less while berserked that bugs me.
And yeah, curry is 6k on bismarck, while chiefkabobs are 18-20k for 12. But I don't mind the expense, honestly. It's not that much, and since I can *see* the difference, I don't feel like I'm wasting gil.
Also, you may have been misreading. What I said was:
"not a whole lot different from mithkabob"
Curry is most certainly better than chiefkabob at 68.
With chiefkabobs: 325+65=390 atk
With yellow curry: 325*1.2=390 atk
As you can see, when your base atk is 325, both add the same ammount of atk and thus you should not be using yellow curry unless your atk is over 325 without food.
Comment