Re: Reprisal
BBQ, (I know you weren't implying this but) I didn't pull that statement out of my ass. I said Hank is definitely wrong, because I went out and let some Lolibris smack me around with and without Phalanx, and with and without Stoneskin, to verify the claims made in the BG thread. And they are most certainly right. Why should Phalanx not be counted when Cocoon is? Because Phalanx is more "superficial", equationwise. It's just a subtraction at the very end of the calculations. Plus, Phalanx may or may not be there. Cocoon affects Defense, and that's a core part of the equations that can't ever be removed.
For your benefit: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...8-07-05-37.jpg
My Phalanx subtracts 18 damage. Reprisal reflects 50%. Add 18 to the non-zero numbers and divide by 2. Also notice how the reflected damages that are less than 9 occur on 0 damage hits.
BBQ, (I know you weren't implying this but) I didn't pull that statement out of my ass. I said Hank is definitely wrong, because I went out and let some Lolibris smack me around with and without Phalanx, and with and without Stoneskin, to verify the claims made in the BG thread. And they are most certainly right. Why should Phalanx not be counted when Cocoon is? Because Phalanx is more "superficial", equationwise. It's just a subtraction at the very end of the calculations. Plus, Phalanx may or may not be there. Cocoon affects Defense, and that's a core part of the equations that can't ever be removed.
For your benefit: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...8-07-05-37.jpg
My Phalanx subtracts 18 damage. Reprisal reflects 50%. Add 18 to the non-zero numbers and divide by 2. Also notice how the reflected damages that are less than 9 occur on 0 damage hits.
Comment