Re: Should Utsusemi: Ni be level 38 or above?
I apologize for coming off more abbrasive than I intended (was in a bad mood last night, and it was reflected in my post, I'm sorry) The pissing and moaning was more in regard to people refusing to listen to any observations, and posting one line about how nooned had addressed the issue (thoug hit already had been addressed for two pages). My problem was with the only reason I could gather from the last two pages was that people felt "less unique" b/c jobs can sub ninja at 74 and use ni. I have never heard of any ninjas at endgame complain about war/nin taking their tanking role in either xp roles or hnms etc. As a ninja I'd be far more concerned with lvls 24-37, where there is a far smaller difference in evasion, and war/nin being able to do more damage with 2x 1h axe than a ninja w/ dual katanas. I've only heard of one war/nin tank ever (Nny) being able to solidly tank an HNM. From my perception, the majority of this thread has been several people giving several good reasons why it shouldnt be changed, and one person saying those reasons arent real reasons at all (but his feeling of "non-uniqueness" is a perfectly good reason to change the requirements). Subbed ni is already slightly nerfed (though I dont feel 1 shadow loss is really much of a nerf, if anything its a mild inconvenience). It was also stated earlier that several "job defining abilities" can be subbed. For instance, I'm a ranger. Both barrage and sidewinder can be used by other jobs subbing ranger. I feel having the option of subbing ni at endgame makes things easier on all jobs. Sometimes shit goes down and those extra 3 shadows can save your ass.
Again, I'm sorry Omni for the way my previous post came across. From what I've read you've done a rather good job of presenting your opinions and defending them.
I apologize for coming off more abbrasive than I intended (was in a bad mood last night, and it was reflected in my post, I'm sorry) The pissing and moaning was more in regard to people refusing to listen to any observations, and posting one line about how nooned had addressed the issue (thoug hit already had been addressed for two pages). My problem was with the only reason I could gather from the last two pages was that people felt "less unique" b/c jobs can sub ninja at 74 and use ni. I have never heard of any ninjas at endgame complain about war/nin taking their tanking role in either xp roles or hnms etc. As a ninja I'd be far more concerned with lvls 24-37, where there is a far smaller difference in evasion, and war/nin being able to do more damage with 2x 1h axe than a ninja w/ dual katanas. I've only heard of one war/nin tank ever (Nny) being able to solidly tank an HNM. From my perception, the majority of this thread has been several people giving several good reasons why it shouldnt be changed, and one person saying those reasons arent real reasons at all (but his feeling of "non-uniqueness" is a perfectly good reason to change the requirements). Subbed ni is already slightly nerfed (though I dont feel 1 shadow loss is really much of a nerf, if anything its a mild inconvenience). It was also stated earlier that several "job defining abilities" can be subbed. For instance, I'm a ranger. Both barrage and sidewinder can be used by other jobs subbing ranger. I feel having the option of subbing ni at endgame makes things easier on all jobs. Sometimes shit goes down and those extra 3 shadows can save your ass.
Again, I'm sorry Omni for the way my previous post came across. From what I've read you've done a rather good job of presenting your opinions and defending them.
Comment