Please note this is not a contest of money, as Temple Gloves are "free" and Kote are not. I have had a pair of Ouchido's Kote since mid 40's.
Ok so I hit 54 today and decided to do some testing between AF and Kote. On average, with the AF gloves equipped, I would do more damage. Here are some tests I ran (equipped with Tactician Magician Hooks and not using Meat Mithkabobs):
-Rolanberry Hornets-
Average Damage AF: 92
Average Damage Kote: 85
-Saromugue Tabar Beaks-
Average Damage AF: 82
Average Damage Kote: 75
Not to mention the additional power to Boost from AF makes your WS's hit a little bit harder (although its hard to practially judge this carefully).
Note that I realize that with a higher constant attack from Kote my accuracy will be slightly better, but if each hit landing does more damage, then your overall damage output is higher (this is similar to the "higher damage or lower delay" thing with MNK h2h weapons - you allways want the higher damage).
So.....I'm confused. The AF seem to be at least on par (if not better) than the Kote.....
I was wondering if any other MNK have ever bothered to check and see what their damage was like with AF and Kote?
Maybe the +4 STR is a big thing for h2h....does STR play a large role in h2h damage? Moreso than Attack?
:confused:
Ok so I hit 54 today and decided to do some testing between AF and Kote. On average, with the AF gloves equipped, I would do more damage. Here are some tests I ran (equipped with Tactician Magician Hooks and not using Meat Mithkabobs):
-Rolanberry Hornets-
Average Damage AF: 92
Average Damage Kote: 85
-Saromugue Tabar Beaks-
Average Damage AF: 82
Average Damage Kote: 75
Not to mention the additional power to Boost from AF makes your WS's hit a little bit harder (although its hard to practially judge this carefully).
Note that I realize that with a higher constant attack from Kote my accuracy will be slightly better, but if each hit landing does more damage, then your overall damage output is higher (this is similar to the "higher damage or lower delay" thing with MNK h2h weapons - you allways want the higher damage).
So.....I'm confused. The AF seem to be at least on par (if not better) than the Kote.....
I was wondering if any other MNK have ever bothered to check and see what their damage was like with AF and Kote?
Maybe the +4 STR is a big thing for h2h....does STR play a large role in h2h damage? Moreso than Attack?
:confused:
Comment