I have been levelling Bard, and I'm at 62 now (teetering on Minuet IV). This argument has been coming up a lot lately and I wanted to get a sample of opinions on it.
Basically, we're talking these songs:
Blade Madrigal: 28 + 4 (instrument) = 32 Accuracy = 16% Hit Rate
Advancing March: +9% Haste with Faerie Piccolo
Victory March: +11% Haste with Faerie Piccolo
Valor Minuet III: 48 + 5 (instrument) = 53 Attack
Now take the following scenarios:
You are in a level 75 Dual Bard Meripo with a NIN Tank. Which four songs do you want on the melees?
For some reason, parties are choosing this foursome:
Blade Madrigal, Minuet IV, Victory March, Advancing March
instead of
Blade Madrigal, Minuet IV, Minuet III, Victory March
which boils down to:
Minuet III vs. Advancing March
Which is better?
+55 Attack or +9% Haste?
My damage calculator tells me that +55 Attack is equivalent to 0% - 27% damage boost versus a mob whose level is 8-10 levels higher than the melees' levels which, if it's an even distribution, is roughly 13.5% higher damage output. Versus anything less than 8 levels above the melees, the low-end rises making it better overall. Therefore the 9% Haste is less effective on mob kills.
The only thing that the 9% haste does that's good for the front-line is make shadows come back 9% quicker, but with Minuet III, I'm killing the mob 4.5% faster, possibly increasing chain. Unless your tank was getting flattened and your healer was running down on MP wouldn't you want the 4.5% death speed more than the 9% shadow recast?
--Now the other argument seems retarded to me.
Some people advocate this combination:
Minuet IV, Minuet III, Victory March, Advancing March
versus my preference same as above boils down to:
Advancing March vs. Blade Madrigal vs. Minuet III
So now, what they're saying is that 9% Haste is better than 16% Hit rate. The death efficiency is 7% better with Blade Madrigal than with Advancing March, and the Minuet III is 2.5% less effective than the 16% hit rate. Why would someone want this combination instead of the one I'm advocating?
Basically, we're talking these songs:
Blade Madrigal: 28 + 4 (instrument) = 32 Accuracy = 16% Hit Rate
Advancing March: +9% Haste with Faerie Piccolo
Victory March: +11% Haste with Faerie Piccolo
Valor Minuet III: 48 + 5 (instrument) = 53 Attack
Now take the following scenarios:
You are in a level 75 Dual Bard Meripo with a NIN Tank. Which four songs do you want on the melees?
For some reason, parties are choosing this foursome:
Blade Madrigal, Minuet IV, Victory March, Advancing March
instead of
Blade Madrigal, Minuet IV, Minuet III, Victory March
which boils down to:
Minuet III vs. Advancing March
Which is better?
+55 Attack or +9% Haste?
My damage calculator tells me that +55 Attack is equivalent to 0% - 27% damage boost versus a mob whose level is 8-10 levels higher than the melees' levels which, if it's an even distribution, is roughly 13.5% higher damage output. Versus anything less than 8 levels above the melees, the low-end rises making it better overall. Therefore the 9% Haste is less effective on mob kills.
The only thing that the 9% haste does that's good for the front-line is make shadows come back 9% quicker, but with Minuet III, I'm killing the mob 4.5% faster, possibly increasing chain. Unless your tank was getting flattened and your healer was running down on MP wouldn't you want the 4.5% death speed more than the 9% shadow recast?
--Now the other argument seems retarded to me.
Some people advocate this combination:
Minuet IV, Minuet III, Victory March, Advancing March
versus my preference same as above boils down to:
Advancing March vs. Blade Madrigal vs. Minuet III
So now, what they're saying is that 9% Haste is better than 16% Hit rate. The death efficiency is 7% better with Blade Madrigal than with Advancing March, and the Minuet III is 2.5% less effective than the 16% hit rate. Why would someone want this combination instead of the one I'm advocating?
Comment