Re: Rare Piece Dynamis Lotting Methodology
To "comment" means to designate that you wish to receive a given shadow item (e.g. Shadow Ring) as your piece for the run in a similar manner as designating a particular relic armor piece. The term "comment" comes from the use of the /seacom command to place the item you wish to lot on in your Search Comment.
No, Ninja and Paladin are Tank jobs. Having either tank job at 75 gives you 5 more cap points. Other (non-tank) jobs don't count toward the cap. Points are only "spent" if you obtain a Shadow Item and you go down to -5 points rather than at 0 points. This means that any fresh noobs will be in line before someone who just received a shadow item.
5. A player is eligible to "comment" a shadow item if no player with a higher point total wishes to comment the same item.
Receiving a given shadow item reduces a player's Score to -5.
You spend points upon acquisition of the item. Having points prevents others from lotting the item if they have fewer points than you. If Fred has 10 points and John has 8, and both want the Shadow Mantle, John is ineligible to "comment" the Shadow Mantle because Fred has more points than he does. Of course, if Tim has 10 points, too, then both he and Fred may lot Shadow Mantle because they have the same number of points. The rules are much simpler than you're making them seem.
4. In order to be eligible to receive a given item, it must be selected in exclusion to all other drops available on the run such as relic armor.
Precisely, you may choose only mantle or ring and you must choose in advance.
Benefit to the LS is integrated into this method as best as possible without introducing subjectivity. If you would like, you can try to develop a metric based on the concept of "the fate of the LS", but I think you'll have a hard time quantifying it.
My feeling is that if you can't in some way quantify or qualify an item rationally, it's probably not fair. Once you have quantified/qualified it, some sort of mathematical operation is applied to it and it is then used to rank or determine eligibility of a given member.
"Benefit to the LS" sort of implies that the recipient of the given item is thereafter bound to contractual service to the LS for an unspecified period of time after they receive the item. This cannot be adjudicated within the scope of the FFXI game system. The easiest way to integrate this is to quantify the "dedication" of an individual to the LS by counting the number of runs they attend against the number they miss. This is accounted for in the metrics used.
Since the primary metric is a measure of "dedication", this allows for a scenario like this:
Bill is the White Mage for the Main Tank party, but he brings his PLD75 on occasion for Dynamis runs as a secondary tank. He has a cap of 10. Farris has both PLD75 and NIN75 and always comes to Dynamis as PLD, occasionally as main tank and has a cap of 15. Bill has only missed 3 runs out of the last 10 and has 4 points. Farris made just enough of the runs to keep eligible, 6 out of 10, and frequently skips city runs so she only has 2 points. Bill is therefore ahead of Farris in terms of lotting rights on shadow gear even though Farris "main tanks" and Bill is a "main healer". Farris has a higher "potential", but it requires more "dedication" to live up to it, so if Farris showed greater dedication than Bill, she would be able to beat him on points because Bill can't have more than 10 and Farris can have up to 15.
Keep in mind, however, that the intent of the thread itself is (as titled) a methodology or study of methods. Which means that what I would like to see would be a point system that you feel is fair (and further discussion on why you think it is good, of course). If there is only one method to discuss, then it's really not a methodology.
Originally posted by DakAttack
View Post
Originally posted by DakAttack
View Post
Originally posted by DakAttack
View Post
Receiving a given shadow item reduces a player's Score to -5.
You spend points upon acquisition of the item. Having points prevents others from lotting the item if they have fewer points than you. If Fred has 10 points and John has 8, and both want the Shadow Mantle, John is ineligible to "comment" the Shadow Mantle because Fred has more points than he does. Of course, if Tim has 10 points, too, then both he and Fred may lot Shadow Mantle because they have the same number of points. The rules are much simpler than you're making them seem.
Originally posted by DakAttack
View Post
Precisely, you may choose only mantle or ring and you must choose in advance.
Originally posted by DakAttack
View Post
My feeling is that if you can't in some way quantify or qualify an item rationally, it's probably not fair. Once you have quantified/qualified it, some sort of mathematical operation is applied to it and it is then used to rank or determine eligibility of a given member.
"Benefit to the LS" sort of implies that the recipient of the given item is thereafter bound to contractual service to the LS for an unspecified period of time after they receive the item. This cannot be adjudicated within the scope of the FFXI game system. The easiest way to integrate this is to quantify the "dedication" of an individual to the LS by counting the number of runs they attend against the number they miss. This is accounted for in the metrics used.
Since the primary metric is a measure of "dedication", this allows for a scenario like this:
Bill is the White Mage for the Main Tank party, but he brings his PLD75 on occasion for Dynamis runs as a secondary tank. He has a cap of 10. Farris has both PLD75 and NIN75 and always comes to Dynamis as PLD, occasionally as main tank and has a cap of 15. Bill has only missed 3 runs out of the last 10 and has 4 points. Farris made just enough of the runs to keep eligible, 6 out of 10, and frequently skips city runs so she only has 2 points. Bill is therefore ahead of Farris in terms of lotting rights on shadow gear even though Farris "main tanks" and Bill is a "main healer". Farris has a higher "potential", but it requires more "dedication" to live up to it, so if Farris showed greater dedication than Bill, she would be able to beat him on points because Bill can't have more than 10 and Farris can have up to 15.
Keep in mind, however, that the intent of the thread itself is (as titled) a methodology or study of methods. Which means that what I would like to see would be a point system that you feel is fair (and further discussion on why you think it is good, of course). If there is only one method to discuss, then it's really not a methodology.
Comment