READ BEFORE VOTING
Would you give up Abyssea? What if we maintained the same level increases/ability changes/spells... etc? What if we still had Empy weapons... but they had somehow incorporated them into the existing zones? What if they did the same thing to AF3 gear and the upgrade items for it? Would you be happier if Abyssea had never been introduced, or do you like things the way they are?
This vote isn't a debate over weather or not it could WORK to include the above things in the existing zones. It's also not a about weather Abyssea should have just been worked differently. This is just a flat out... would you take it all back... or was it a good idea. Vote honestly.
--------------------------------------------------------
Down here in the responses... feel free to discuss the ins and outs. Argue the basis behind your vote and open yourself to the harsh sting of criticism. If you would change it... what would you change? Would you change it at all? How? Why?
Food for thought
It was recently discussed on the official forums... but it would appear that the Dev team might have some regrets regarding Abyssea. They expressed in a recent interview that it has made it difficult for them to re-invigorate interest in anything outside of those zones. Link: Newest interview (abyssea was a mistake?)
My own personal food for thought
Sure, they're making adjustments to Limbus, Salvage, Dynamis, Einherjar and other stuff too... but is it too little too late? Will they ever be able to effectively pull people back out of Abyssea? What about this new stuff they've got in the works... you think it'll work to get people out or will it end up like Voidwatch and take second chair? Discuss...
Comment