Introducing the BG-Wiki

[Armando]

Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki



Balfree, is that you?

[Legal Fish]

Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

Balfree, as the OP, I'd like this thread locked. It didn't serve it's purpose and I don't think it ever will.

Concerning me "bashing" the History of Vana'diel, I'm more peeved by the fact it's shoved into new players faces(like being a sticky) when they ask "Hey, where can I learn the history of Vana'diel?". It's not the history, it's the plot ;/. It's not named correctly, and if you give it to a new player who doesn't specifically ask "I want to see some spoilers" you are doing them a disservice. It's a good resource for people who lost track of the storyline.

I think the problem is that it's the only site of it's kind. Well, to be correct, there is no Vana'diel History fansite. It's the only site that looks like a History site. When I voice my complaints, a moderator told me that I should make a site then. Well, now I intend to return on that statement and make THE Vana'diel History site(well, only a portion of a site). I can only hope people will instead show that to new players.

There's a big difference from refusing to use the site and what I think of the "Spoilers of Vana'diel". I still find uses for it, but people are using it incorrectly by spoiling the game's great story in place of finding history. It's a good site, I'm not bashing it, well, maybe the name.

I also would like to bring up the ultimate new player guide I never got around to writing(being banned turned me off). I will be continuing it once my current project gets mostly complete. I will post this guide both on this site and the wiki.

[Icemage]

Re: Introducing the BG-Wiki

I've been keeping an eye on this thread for the past couple of days and besides the unnecessary bickering, there's nothing useful being discussed here. Just a bunch of people venting about random things.

As the OP requests, then...

TOPIC CLOSED.


Icemage
FFXIOnline Forum Super Moderator