Re: a new merit system please?
first off, I wanna point out that this was my original sentence:
But I didn't want to call it, so I edited it out since that'd make people go out of their way to avoid saying just that. Thus, I threw up a little when I read this:
lawl.
next order of bid'niz:
No you don't. I don't need to look further for proof:
There. This is the part where I make claims like:
I have a friend who barely ever plays. Big part of that being that me and my sister are always doing 70+ stuff. He's 55. It's not very appealing when the only thing we can do with him is to help him with his AF. It makes him feel like there's nothing he can do for us (and there really isn't). If I could lower my level to exp with him, it'd make it a lot more appealing for him (especially since he's a magnet for the worst parties possible).
Would I care if I wasn't getting 14k/hour? I'd be happy to get 5k limit points/hour because you know what? I'm enjoying the company of friends in what I last knew to be a social game.
There's also the factor of availability and what-have-you. i.e. everyone's 75 these days so it's a bit harder to get parties in the lower levels. It's even harder to find a 75 merit spot open.
But I don't really care to defend the idea much more because it's obvious it's not a popular one. That's fine by me.
What it comes down to at the end of the day: I don't care about joking and having fun, but you made a fellow poster seem like an idiot. Not just a kind jibe, you made him feel like an inferior human being. Do I sound like a kindergarten teacher yet?
I fail to see how it's a joke if you scare someone away from the boards. Someone who'll no doubt think dual wield doubles tp gain and damage since we weren't around to tell him otherwise...
And Skoal: I wouldn't want it implemented unless you could choose the exact level -- afterall, look at Assaults and the fact that you can cap yourself to the level of one member if you're level 63, for instance. And being able to set myself at level 33 for a Citadel party would be A OK, even when everyone else hits 35. I can leave, go change cap and come back, or make it capable of changing on the fly instead of just at moogle. Many things you could do with it -- just because we have ideas doesn't mean that if S-E implemented them that we'd be pissed unless they did it exactly how we wanted. That was a confusing sentence but I mean to say that S-E still makes the game.
first off, I wanna point out that this was my original sentence:
Originally posted by me
Originally posted by SevIfrit
next order of bid'niz:
Originally posted by Mhurron
Originally posted by Mhurron
Originally posted by Me
Would I care if I wasn't getting 14k/hour? I'd be happy to get 5k limit points/hour because you know what? I'm enjoying the company of friends in what I last knew to be a social game.
There's also the factor of availability and what-have-you. i.e. everyone's 75 these days so it's a bit harder to get parties in the lower levels. It's even harder to find a 75 merit spot open.
But I don't really care to defend the idea much more because it's obvious it's not a popular one. That's fine by me.
What it comes down to at the end of the day: I don't care about joking and having fun, but you made a fellow poster seem like an idiot. Not just a kind jibe, you made him feel like an inferior human being. Do I sound like a kindergarten teacher yet?
I fail to see how it's a joke if you scare someone away from the boards. Someone who'll no doubt think dual wield doubles tp gain and damage since we weren't around to tell him otherwise...
And Skoal: I wouldn't want it implemented unless you could choose the exact level -- afterall, look at Assaults and the fact that you can cap yourself to the level of one member if you're level 63, for instance. And being able to set myself at level 33 for a Citadel party would be A OK, even when everyone else hits 35. I can leave, go change cap and come back, or make it capable of changing on the fly instead of just at moogle. Many things you could do with it -- just because we have ideas doesn't mean that if S-E implemented them that we'd be pissed unless they did it exactly how we wanted. That was a confusing sentence but I mean to say that S-E still makes the game.
Comment