Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Blacklist drama

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Blacklist drama

    Originally posted by Kirsteena
    Public blacklisting of members of your community? I have to ask myself what right do you have to publicly stand up and say 'xyz' has done something wrong, and that they deserve public vilification? It hardly lends itself to a fair judgement. Yes it may be your opinion, and you may well have evidence to back you up, but you are imposing it on others and only letting them see one side of the argument. And I prefer to make my own judgement call. Yes, I know very well who a number of the RMT are on my server. If someone asks me is player1 a known gilseller, I will give my opinion, but after that it is up to the person who asks me to make their own call. I will not try to influence anyone.

    One thing never to forget: more than 50% of communication is body language - anything can be misinterpreted if it is merely written down. I know I am terrible for it, as my linkshell will attest. That will always affect judgement.
    My view is pretty similar. I've been playing MMOs for a few years now, and I've managed to hit some of the more popular ones in that time. All of them have problems that are commonly shared (RMT, griefing), and all of them have problems unique to them because of individual game mechanics. I've seen public blacklists created for all of them, for a myriad of reasons and with an equal number of different effects and reactions.

    Personally, I rarely pay public Blacklists any mind. Most are merely a listing of names and a sort of general statement as to why everyone should avoid them. I've seen listings of people who are bad at X job, or people who steal treasure, or people who grief other players, etc. What all of them have in common is that I very rarely know any of the names on the list personally, nor in many cases do I know the list maker any better. Who do I side with there? Random Person A who apparently did something wrong? Or Random Person B who made the claim about Person A? What almost all of these lists are lacking in is concrete proof to give anyone a reason to side with the person making the claim.

    Maybe it's just the way I play the game. Maybe it's just the fact that I understand that frustrating things happen from time to time (see my little ranty thread from earlier this week), and I don't let those things get to me. But I just can't see any reason for creating a public blacklist of individuals for any reason - no matter how angry they may have made me. Because ultimately it won't work, and ultimately it's my word against theirs.

    All I have is what I see with my own two eyes, and what people say when I'm having a discussion with them. I can't see if they are running bots and hacks in the background. I can't see if they are farming gil to sell, or just farming gil to buy that piece of armor they want. I don't know if they are claiming an HNM for an item to use, or claiming it so that they can monopolize the spawn and sell the chance to lot to another player (RMT aren't the only ones guilty of this). I don't have any more information than any other casual observer, and as such, I don't have the authority to make anything beyond the most general of claims against another player.

    And neither does anyone else. And that's why I don't trust/like/agree with public blacklists.

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: Blacklist drama

      Confrontational accusation removed - Icemage
      Last edited by Icemage; 06-30-2006, 01:15 PM.

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: Blacklist drama

        Inappropriate and offtopic text removed - Icemage

        NOONE DARE TOUCH THIS POST..............

        Kailea, RD, both of you take it to PMs or I'll slap a warning on you both.

        P.S. to Kailea and others who may object to the moderation in this thread - personal attacks of this sort are why the previous topic was closed and why this one was created. The moderation team here will not tolerate more attacks, and we will take whatever measures are necessary to ensure that people do not resume their running battles. Do I make myself clear? - Icemage
        Last edited by Icemage; 06-30-2006, 01:14 PM.
        -------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Kain (FFIV): I am aware of my actions, but can do nothing about them.

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: Blacklist drama

          More confrontational accusations removed. - Icemage
          Last edited by Icemage; 06-30-2006, 01:18 PM.

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: Blacklist drama

            Confrontational posting removed - Icemage
            Last edited by Icemage; 06-30-2006, 01:18 PM.
            -------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Kain (FFIV): I am aware of my actions, but can do nothing about them.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: Blacklist drama

              People who refuse to give ground, who ignore any proof by the other side in this matter, whether they be from either side, are as bad as those who they are fighting against.


              Better?

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: Blacklist drama

                Originally posted by RunningDemon
                People who refuse to give ground, who ignore any proof by the other side in this matter, whether they be from either side, are as bad as those who they are fighting against.


                Better?
                Yes, thank you. And I agree fully with that statement.


                Icemage

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: Blacklist drama

                  Blacklists are a tool to weed out that which society deems unfit. I believe if the society decides the tool is broken they will stop using it, or replace it if the tool is integral.

                  I think this might bring up the issue of scope, but I believe the scope is as small as possible unless otherwise stated. It's probably not best to assume otherwise.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: Blacklist drama

                    and I dont agree with you and find most evidence to be BS...


                    is that better o master....? HUH?.....*mumbles*
                    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Kain (FFIV): I am aware of my actions, but can do nothing about them.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: Blacklist drama

                      Originally posted by Icemage
                      Yes, thank you. And I agree fully with that statement.


                      Icemage
                      I agree it's better. Would like to see more specifics presented on why it's bad to have the blacklist.

                      Most frequent responce is generally stating "Why someone has the right to make a public list?"

                      Focus wasn't exactly about someone making a public blacklist, close enough though. Focus was more to point out strong stands of how a blacklist helps and how it hurts.


                      Cheezy Test Result (I am nerdier than 96% of all people. Are you nerdier? Click here to find out!)

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: Blacklist drama

                        Originally posted by ImpactionActionHero
                        Blacklists are a tool to weed out that which society deems unfit. I believe if the society decides the tool is broken they will stop using it, or replace it if the tool is integral.

                        I think this might bring up the issue of scope, but I believe the scope is as small as possible unless otherwise stated. It's probably not best to assume otherwise.
                        Agreed regarding scope. Then again, if the scope is small, then society isn't probably the best word. "A small group" would be more accurate.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: Blacklist drama

                          Originally posted by Kailea
                          and I dont agree with you and find most evidence to be BS...


                          is that better o master....? HUH?.....*mumbles*
                          Pushing it, but not tangible enough. more of a point would help. Otherwise you're statement doesn't hold once an agreeable method of evidence comes about to confirm a person on a blacklist.

                          The strongest going backing that blacklists have going for or against it is the morality of the person who makes it. Can a single person have the moral fiber to make a list without using to just simply target people he doesn't like.

                          If a single person can't do that then is it agreeable that an appointed group can?
                          Last edited by Macht; 06-30-2006, 01:46 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost


                          Cheezy Test Result (I am nerdier than 96% of all people. Are you nerdier? Click here to find out!)

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: Blacklist drama

                            Originally posted by Macht
                            I agree it's better. Would like to see more specifics presented on why it's bad to have the blacklist.

                            Most frequent responce is generally stating "Why someone has the right to make a public list?"

                            Focus wasn't exactly about someone making a public blacklist, close enough though. Focus was more to point out strong stands of how a blacklist helps and how it hurts.
                            you want more reasons on why public blacklisting is bad? Do you even need more then one!............

                            public blacklisting......
                            1 couses unwanted drama to the site or area it is posted at
                            2 hurts inocents on the list (every public blist has atlease 1% inocent on it)
                            3 hurts the area where the list pertains
                            4 causes unwanted traffic to that area or site
                            5 Gives the creator of the list to much power
                            6 Causes "witch hunts" sometimes

                            pretty sure there are more......but I cant think of them at this moment

                            Double Post Edited:
                            Originally posted by Macht
                            Pushing it, but not tangible enough. more of a point would help. Otherwise you're statement doesn't hold once an agreeable method of evidence comes about to confirm a person on a blacklist.

                            The strongest going backing that blacklists have going for or against it is the morality of the person who makes it. Can a single person have the moral fiber to make a list without using to just simply target people he doesn't like.

                            If a single person can't do that then is it agreeable that an appointed group can?
                            yeah and I dont think anyone not even a group has that moral fiber to own a public black list..........
                            Last edited by Kailea; 06-30-2006, 01:49 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
                            -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            Kain (FFIV): I am aware of my actions, but can do nothing about them.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: Blacklist drama

                              Originally posted by Macht
                              Pushing it, but not tangible enough. more of a point would help. Otherwise you're statement doesn't hold once an agreeable method of evidence comes about to confirm a person on a blacklist.

                              The strongest going backing that blacklists have going for or against it is the morality of the person who makes it. Can a single person have the moral fiber to make a list without using to just simply target people he doesn't like.

                              If a single person can't do that then is it agreeable that an appointed group can?
                              Actually it doesn't matter if an 'agreeable method of evidence' is found. If the ability and right of the person(s) creating and maintaining the list is in question how they go about it means very little.

                              It would only be different for an appointed group if the appointed group was selected from people who could have the rights and abilities to do so and were appointed by someone with such authority.
                              I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are.

                              HTTP Error 418 - I'm A Teapot - The resulting entity body MAY be short and stout.

                              loose

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: Blacklist drama

                                Originally posted by Mhurron
                                Actually it doesn't matter if an 'agreeable method of evidence' is found. If the ability and right of the person(s) creating and maintaining the list is in question how they go about it means very little.

                                It would only be different for an appointed group if the appointed group was selected from people who could have the rights and abilities to do so and were appointed by someone with such authority.
                                Agreed. If it's just "for the community by the community" they don't really have any authority beyond what another individual affords them, and as such they really have none.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X