Re: Awesome testing done on enmity
It's long been believed from anecdotal experience that the enmity of cures varies according to the enmity already possessed by the person being cured, as well as the amount cured. This may not apply to Cure V's permanent enmity, but only to the temporary enmity of cures in general (which is probably more difficult to test).
The fact that Dispel has large permanent enmity while Provoke has very little suggests that for long fights, a PLD/RDM might hold hate better than a PLD/WAR. Dispel and Sleep are both fairly cheap and give substantial permanent hate whether they do anything or not. (But volatile hate and the hate shed by being hit might have a bigger impact, depending on the fight. If volatile hate is lost first to hits, then Provoke's hate may not be all that volatile in reality, since it would protect your permanent enmity the same way Stoneskin protects your permanent HP.)
It's long been believed from anecdotal experience that the enmity of cures varies according to the enmity already possessed by the person being cured, as well as the amount cured. This may not apply to Cure V's permanent enmity, but only to the temporary enmity of cures in general (which is probably more difficult to test).
The fact that Dispel has large permanent enmity while Provoke has very little suggests that for long fights, a PLD/RDM might hold hate better than a PLD/WAR. Dispel and Sleep are both fairly cheap and give substantial permanent hate whether they do anything or not. (But volatile hate and the hate shed by being hit might have a bigger impact, depending on the fight. If volatile hate is lost first to hits, then Provoke's hate may not be all that volatile in reality, since it would protect your permanent enmity the same way Stoneskin protects your permanent HP.)
Comment